Powered by Bravenet Bravenet Blog

Monday, September 12th 2016

11:09 AM


Henan potters were widely regarded as the inventor of Jun effect glaze It is actually a form of celadon glaze but with bluish iridescence on the surface of the glaze. In the past literature on Chinese ceramics, it was widely accepted that Tang Henan Lushan (河南鲁山) ware with bluish white iridesence splashes was the progenitor of Jun ware. 


Tang Lushan Fragment with bluish opalescent splash


Two Henan Jun sherds, the top Yuan and bottom Jin


In the archaeological excavation of Henan Liu Jia men Jun site, Prof. Qin Da shu, an archaeologist from the Beijing University noted that a thick layer of earth separated the strata layers of Tang Jun shards and Song/Jin shard. Obviously there was a big lapse in time between the production of both wares. Hence past conclusion on the evolvment of Tang Jun glaze to the ultimate Jun glaze is called into question.

The likelihood that other kiln potters may be the actual inventor of Jun effect glaze germinated in my mind when I came across some late Tang/5 Dynasty Changsha wares from a wreck in Central Vietnam. The Jun effect of celadon glaze with bluish iridescence is so apparent on the vessels.


Left late Tang/5 Dynasties Tang bowl and right Yuan Jun dish

The bluish iridescence on the surface of the glaze of both vessel is obvious


 Another encounter took place when I view the Belitung exhibition at Singapore ACM. Right in front on my eyes was a group of Changsha vessels with Jun effect glaze. I also notice that such glaze continued to be produced by other Hunan kilns for eg. those in Hengshan.


Group of Tang Changsha wares with Jun effect from the Belitung wreck


Song Henan Hengshan kiln ewer with Jun effect glaze and iron-brown floral motif


I believe Changsha potters who were famous for the polychrome brown/green decoration may actually be the pioneers of Jun effect glaze. At least by the early 9th century the glaze composition was already available. The glaze formula may have been transmitted to the Henan potters who further improved on it. The final product was a thicker glaze which enhances the intensity of the colour.

A friend had come across an old scientific analysis report done on Changsha Jun effect. He said that the analysis showed that the glaze showed sign of liquid-liquid phase separation. This is an essential characteristics necessary to produce the optical blue present on Jun ware. This is called the Raleigh optical effect and scientific explanation for why the sky appears blue for example.

For more discussion on Jun ware, please rad below article:


1 Comment(s) / Post Comment

Friday, March 11th 2011

12:58 PM

Ceramics finds in Singapore from Pre-colonial Period

  • Mood:

Ceramics finds in Singapore from the Pre- Colonial (before 1819 A.D) period 


In Feb 1822, Dr. John Crawfurd, who subsequently became the second Resident of Singapore, climbed Fort Canning Hill and discovered foundations of wooden buidings, Chinese coins and fragments of ancient ceramics.  He also noted remains of an earthen rampart about 3.6m wide and 2.7 m in height.  This rampart was located along what is present day's Stamford canal.  Sir Stamford Raffles apparently believed that Fort Canning hill was the site which ancient Malay kings resided.  In a letter written on 21 Jan 1823 to William Marsden from his residence at the top of  Fort Canning Hill,  he wrote about the house  and that  : "....the tombs of the Malay kings are close at hand and I have settled that if it is my fate to die here I shall take my place amongst them ..".  



Raffles gathered large amount of  information related to the Southeast Asian region in his search for an ideal  location to establish a free port for the British  East India Company.  He decided on Singapore as his choice.  In this search, he must have come across the Malay literary work,  Serjarah Melayu, also called the Malay Annals.  It  contained semi historical and mythical narrations on the descents of the Malay kings of Melaka, the geat Malay maritime port of the 15th century.  It also dealt with events which were probably both a mixture of myths and facts of the period and information on the unique system of government, administration and politics. The kings were said to be the descendants of Alexander the Great.  One of them, Sang Nila Utama married the daughter of the Queen of Bintan.  One day in the year 1299,  he visited an Island where he sighted a lion-like animal.  He named the Island Singapura, ie the Lion city.   He established a state there which according to the Malay annals lasted for about a 100 years and ruled by a total of 5 kings.  According the Malay Annals, the 5th king Sultan Iskandar Shah humiliated his mistress due to some rumours.  She was the daughter of the the treasury officer.  Out of anger, he assisted the Majapahit  empire to invade Singapore.  The sultan fled with his followers and eventually founded Melaka.  A conflicting account by  the son of Alfonso D'Albuquerque, the Portuguese viceroy who conquered Melaka in 1511, stated that the 5th ruler of Singapura was Parameswara.  He was a prince from Palembang who failed in an attempt to set up a state there.   The army from Majapahit chased him and he fled to Singapura .  He murdered the local ruler and ruled for 5 years.  He was forced to abandon Singapura after the  ruler of Patani, who was the brother of the murdered local ruler, led an army to seek revenge.   Another version said that the murdered Singapura ruler was the son-in-low of the King of Siam and it was the army of the latter which drove him out of Singapura. Despite all the contradictions, one thing was certain.  A thriving community existed in Singapore during the 14th century and there was a ruler.  The Malay Annals depicted it as a prosperous state and a golden phase in the Malay history.  

The only extant writing which throws some light on the nature of the community, the custom  and the economic activities of ancient Singapore during the 14th century is the Daoyi Zhilue.  It was written by Yuan traveller, Wang Dayuan.   He made two overseas  trips in 1330 and 1339 which covered regions in Southeast Asia , India and the Middle East.   In the section on Temasek, an ancient reference to Singapore, he mentioned two places.  One is Longyyamen ie Dragon's Tooth Gate.  This has been identified as an  area in Keppel habour.  In the 19th century, there existed  a stone protrusion at Labrador point whch looks like the tooth of a dragon.  It was blown up in the 19th century.  He mentioned that Chinese resided among the natives.  Local products such as lakawood and tin were traded for chinese goods such gold, satin, cotton prints, Chu porcelain ( ie longquan celadon as chu referred to ancient Longquan) and iron cauldrons.   He also noted that the natives engaged in piracy.  When junks loaded with goods from the  western ocean reached the Ji-limen (Karimun),  the natives from Longyamen would ambush,  rob and kill all the crew and passengers on the junks.    The other place associated with ancient Singapore is Ban-zu.   The word is believed to be a transliteration of the Malay word pancur, ie spring of water.  It is generally believed to be reference to the area bounded by Fort Canning Hill, the Singapore river and Stamford Road.  Coincidentally, there was a spring at Fort Canning in the past.  The natives were described as honest and wore their hair short  with gold brocaded satin turbans and dressed in  red oiled cloths.   They boiled sea water to obtain salt and made spirit from rice called ming-jia.  They were ruled by a chieftain..  Goods that were traded included green cottons, iron, cotton prints made locally, porcelains, iron pots and etc.

Unforturnately all the surface remnants of building structures, artefacts and the rampart were destroyed by subsequent developments on Fort Canning.  The brick platforms Crawfurd saw was demolished when the fortress was built in 1859.  Other artefacts on the top of the hill were removed during the process of building a covered reservoir in 1926 and the underground command centre for the Bristish Far East Command in the 1930s.  A split sandstone boulder with ancient inscription standing at the mouth of the Singapore river was destroyed in 1843 to make way for development.  It is also termed the Singapore stone.  Fragments of the inscriptons were kept in Singapore National museum and the Calcutta Museum.  The inscripton was written in a form of kawi script which dated to Majapahit or earlier.  It could have shed some light on the past history of Singapore. 

To learn more about the past, archaeological excavations were carried out on a site near the Keremat at Fort Canning in 1984, a site at the New Parliament house in 1994 and a site at Empress place in 1998.  The excavatons uncovered large amount of pottery and porcelain fragments.  Analysis of the  fragments found at the Fort Canning site showed that they dated to the 14th century ie equivalent to the Yuan period.  The other fragments were from the 19th century and later.  It appears that there is no fragment from the 15th to 18th century.   Numerous number of glass beads and fragments of glass artefacts were found at the site.  There could be a glass workshop in the past.  The ceramics finds are comparatively finer then those from the other two excavated site.  It appears to corroborate its past stated history.  The place was abandoned when the ruler fled to Melaka.   The Malays called Fort Canning Hill by the name  "Bukit Larangan" ie the Forbidden Hill.  Their ancestors  had told them tales of the past glory of Singapore and that the ghosts of the past kings haunted the place.  Hence it is sort of a sacred place and taboo for common folks to set foot on the hill.



On the other two sites, majority of the ceramics fragments recovered were similar to those on Fort Canning .  However, there were also small amount that could be dated to the 15th century.  The rest were from 19th century onward.   When the local ruler fled for Melaka, some of the natives continued to stay at the area  below the Hill near the Singapore river.  During the 15th century, Melaka became the great dominant trading port in  the Southeast Asia region and controlled the flow of goods between the East and West.  Singapura apparently was much neglected and engaged in little trading activities.

Besides the fragments on display at the Fort Canning excavated site, some of the fragments from the site at Paliament House and the Empress place are displayed at the Asian Civilisation Museum.  I have also taken some photos of the fragments found at Fort Canning when they were on display at an Exhibition of Southeast Asian Ceramics at the NUS Museum in 2010. 

The types of Chinese ceramics fragments basically were similar to those trade ceramics found in other sites in Southeast Asia.  During the 14th Century Yuan period, the main types of ceramics exported were Qingbai, shufu, underglaze copper red and blue and white from Jiangxi Jingdezhen, Celadon from Longquan in Zhejiang and smaller number from Fujian, and white wares from Fujian, especially  Dehua kiln.  Some of the blue and white, Qingbai and longquan celadon fragments recovered were of high quality.  Interesting pieces recovered from Fort Canning site included a bowl decorated with design of the compass with characters representing the directions.  There were also fragments including small figurines from a Qingbai pillow. 


 To give an idea of how some of the complete pieces would look like, I have attached below photos of some pieces in my collection which were acquired in Indonesia.

Among the ceramics fragments, there were also some Vietnamese blue and white wares, Thai Sawankhalok celadon wares and iron-black painted covered boxes.  The Vietnamese blue and white and Thai iron-black painted cover boxes fragments are dated to 2nd half of the 15th century.  The 15th century was a phase which was important for Thai and Vietnamese trade ceramics.  During the Hongwu period (late 14th century), the emperor imposed a ban on contact with foreigners and foreign  trade.   Hence, little amount of Chinese ceramics found their way to Southeast Asia during this period.  The need of the Southeast Asian consumers for ceramics was filled by the potters from Vietnam and Thailand.  During this period, Vietnamese blue and white, Thai celadon and iron-painted wares were popular in the region.  During the late 15th century period, Chinese blue and white wares were again exported in rather substantial amount to the region.  They were similar to those from the wreck termed the Lena cargo.  It was found near the Philipinnes Palawan strait.  Recently, similar shipwreck Hongzhi blue and whites  started to appear in the Jakarta antique market.  They were said to be from a wreck in the Java sea.  Chinese ceramics regained their dominant market position in the overseas market during the 16th century.



To learn more about the Chinese and Vietnamese ceramics mentioned, you may want to read the following articles I have written:

1)  Yuan blue and white

2)  Longquan Celadon

3)  Vietnamese Blue and white


During the 16th century to 18th century, the fortune of Singapura declined further.  The Portuguese conquered Melaka in 1511 and the Melaka loyalty fled and subsequently founded the Johore Sultanate.  For most of the time, it held dominion over Singapura.  Singapura was caught in the power tussles of various regional powers such as the Johore Sultanate, Aceh, Jambi, Siak, Bugis,  Portuguese and Dutch at different point of time.  It was even the site of some ancient battles.  So far, the only ceramics finds were some MIng Wanli period blue and white  (dated late 16th to early 17th century) fragments of some plates and a bowl.  They were recovered from the Kallang estuary when the Kallang river was dredged up to clean the river in the late 1960/70.  No substantive evidence is available to show that Singapore played a significant role in the trade which the Johore Sultanate continued to enjoy.  The goods were shipped up the Johore river.  Large amount of 16th Chinese blue and white were also found at Johore Lama, at one point the capital of the Johore Sultanate. 


Singapore regained its place as an important entrepot after it was chosen as the location to establish a free port in 1819 by Sir Stamford Raffles.

8 Comment(s) / Post Comment

Saturday, March 5th 2011

2:04 PM

An Early Qing bowl with the "Magic Square" motif

  • Mood:


An Early Qing bowl with the "Magic Square" motif


Few years ago, I acquired the below bowl decorated with Islamic inscriptions  from Moongate, an antique shop in Tanglin.  Moongate was a long established antique shop which was in business since the 1970s.   After the end of confrontation, many excavated and shipwreck Chinese and Southeast Asian ceramic wares from Indonesia flooded the Singapore antique market.    There were also some treasured heirloom pieces which were passed down for many generations by the natives. According to the dealer Mr Goh, many members of the Singapore Southeast Asian Ceramics Society used to visit his shop and held frequent discussions.  Many of the collections of the early Singaporean collectors consisted of such export wares which were highly demanded by consumers from Southeast Asia since the Tang dynasty.   Chinese ceramics constituted an important export items which were gathered at ancient Chinese ports such as Guangzhou and Quanzhou and shipped along the ancient maritime trade route to region as far as Eastern Africa.



Chinese export ceramics with islamic koran inscription first appeared on Tang Changsha wares.    The Persian and Arab traders played a key role in the shipment of Chinese products along the ancient overland and maritime trade routes.  There were large community of Persian and Arabs in cities such as Guangzhou and Quanzhou during Tang Dynasty.  Ancient ceramics such as Yue, Xing and Changsha wares had been excavated in ancient sites such Fustat in Eygpt,  Basra and Siraf in the Middle East.   Many of the shapes and motifs found on those export wares drew their inspiration from Middle Eastern wares.    The Tang cargo from the Belitugn shipwreck was purchased by the Singapore Government and some of the fineness pieces are now on display at the Singapore Marina Sands ArtScience Museum.   The wrecked ship called a dhow  is of Middle Eastern design, and is quoted as the first physical proof of Persian/Arab direct involvement in shipment of Chinese goods along the maritime trade route.   After the the Tang period,  Chinese ceramics with Islamic inscriptions were apparently not produced.  It resurfaced again during the Zhengde period (early 16th century)  and formed part of the decoration for blue and white wares.  Many of such items were ordered by Eunuchs who embraced Islam.  Islamic inscription constituting part or whole of the design, in underglaze blue or overglaze enameled form, was particularly popular during the 17th/18th century and could be found in collections in the  Islamic world such as Indonesia, India and Turkey. 


Changsha jar with Islamic koran inscription "there is no god but God" .  Translated in Chinese as "万物无主,唯有真主“

The symbolic significance of the motif on the bowl  intrigues me.  The shape and fine paste pointed to a 18th century dating for the bowl and is a product of Jingdezhen kiln.  I was very happy when I finally found an article entitled "Some Chinese Islamic "Magic Square" Porcelain" in the book "Studies in Chinese Ceramics" by Prof. Cheng Te-kun.  He learnt from a Singapore collector Mr Tan Yeok Seong that a group of Chinese export wares decorated with Islamic inscriptions and magic square surfaced in the Singapore antique market in 1969 and were eagerly snapped up by local collectors.  Such items appeared to be rather rare and we could hardly  find one in the antique market nowadays.

In his article, Prof. Cheng discussed the significance and the origin of the magic square and also the meaning of the inscriptions.   He did research on a porcelain plate with the magic square encircled by bands on of inscriptions, similar to my bowl  in terms of design layout, which was presented to Queen Mary of UK when she visited Hyderabad of India in 1906 A.D.  It was a treasure of Golconda Fort. The plate was subsequently housed in the Victoria and Albert Museum.   The plate was a product of Jingdezhen kiln and dated to the 18th century.  The verses found in the bands on the inner wall of the plate were verses from the Koran and some Islamic prayer books.  He enlisted the help of Dr. Hassan Javadi from the University of Teheran to decipher the inscriptions.  There were mistakes in the  writing as can expected.  The Chinese potter who wrote the inscriptions did not know the Arabic language and simply copied the text from some samples.  In the case of the plate, Dr. Hassan was still able to decipher  majority of the inscriptions.  For eg. the first band near the rim was from verses 256 and 275(2) from the Koran.  It reads :"(In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate God,) there is no god but He, the Living, the Everlasting.  Slumber seizes Him not, neither sleep: to Him belongs all that is in the heavens and the earth.  Who is there that shall intercede with Him save by His leave? He knows what lies before them and what is after them, and they comprehend not anything of His knowledge save such as He wills.  His throne comprises the heavens and earth; the preserving of them oppresses Him not: He is the All-high and the All-glorious".

Surrounding the square, there are inscriptions which is translated as follows: "There is no man like Ali (Cousin of Mohamed).  There is no sword like Zulfakar (his sword)".

The square is sub-divided into 16 small squares.   Each has 2 digit number in black.  The magic square in the plate is of the order 4.  There are 4 squares either vertically, horizontally or diagonally.  The sum of the number in any of the direction added up to the same amount.  In the case of that on the plate, it added up to 194. 

The magic square originated from China.  According the the ancient Chinese literature dating to about 650BC,  During the time of  the mythical  king Yu (), there was a great flood.  He  tried to channel the water out to sea where then emerged a turtle from the river Luo.  It's shell has a 3 by 3 grid pattern with  circular dots of numbers.    The sum of the numbers in each row, column and diagonal added up to 15.  It is  the number of days in each of the 24 cycles of the Chinese solar year.   The square was called the Lo Shu or "scroll of the river".   The magic square  pattern is said to be used by the ancient  people in controlling the river. 

During the ancient time, magic squares were believed to possess astrological and divinatory qualities, their usage ensuring longevity and prevention of diseases. Magic squares were known to Islamic mathematicians, possibly as early as the 7th century, when the Arabs came in contact with Indian culture, and learned Indian mathematics and astronomy. It has also been suggested that the idea came via China.

For more on the Magic square, please read this.

According to Prof. Schuyler Cammann of the University of Philadephia,  the magic square was used to express symbolically the essence of Islamic thinking in cosmology.  The magic square is considered to be a model of the universe and is said to be a graphic illustrations of the Islamic concept that Allah is both the Source and the Destination of all things.

Those plates and bowls with the magic square were used as medicine bowls in the Islamic world.   The koran inscriptions and the magic square is believed to impart magical power to ward off evil.  Such bowls and plates were previously treasured heirloom.  After passing down for generations, the significance were forgotten by most of their descendants and many were sold as antiques to eager collectors.

Most of the inscriptions contained many mistakes and even in highly corrupted form beyond recognition.  For my bowl, I would appreciate if any reader would let me know if they could decipher any of the texts.


10 Comment(s) / Post Comment